If conservative commentator Ben Shapiro has a catchphrase, it’s “Facts don’t care about your feelings.”
In a sense he’s right—how you and I feel about the truth doesn’t change it’s truthfulness.
But the approach that flows from this truth woefully misunderstands human nature.
Shapiro has made a name for himself as a debater, with viral videos of him “DESTROYING” liberal logic displaying his acumen for tearing apart talking points.
Because of this, he and many other conservatives believe such debate is one of the best weapons to combat our cultural problems. Good arguments will win in the end, right?
This is giving people way too much credit.
It is focusing entirely on the head as the locus of a person’s decision-making, ignoring the heart completely. This is why, no matter how many times Shapiro and co. dismantle somebody’s faulty logic, it rarely results in the person conceding and changing sides.
Jonathan Haidt explained this best with his elephant analogy (of which you can watch a longer breakdown here).
Essentially, the human is like the union of an elephant and a man riding atop the elephant. The man might think he’s in control with some kind of reins, but if the elephant decides it’s going somewhere, then that’s where they’re going. And, at that point the rider will convince himself that that’s where he wanted to go, too—that it was his idea.
In other words, the heart subconsciously drives most of our decision-making, and the head consciously finds a defensible explanation for the decisions the heart already made.
This is why “DESTROYING” arguments and creating cognitive dissonance in people rarely causes change.
If they don’t want to change, and if they feel the social or emotional cost of change would be too high, then most people will not change. Trying to drive change through argumentation is like yelling at the rider to make his stubbornly eastbound elephant turn west.
There are a number of important applications to this, such as a discussion of why the Bible warns us against trusting our hearts (Jeremiah 17:9), and why we must build self-awareness and a community who will help us see our blind spots driven by what we desire to believe.
But the point I want to make here builds on my Individualism is a Lie article about how we are heavily influenced by culture whether we realize it or not. As tribally minded people, much of what motivates the elephant is a desire to fit in with the group. So our subconscious, the elephant, is often not asking “what is correct?” but rather “What do people want me to believe?”
You might think this is too cynical a view of people’s reasoning skills.
If you’re the kind of person who donates money to read theoretical articles like this, there’s a decent chance you’re pretty good at independent, critical thinking, and so you might assume everybody else is, too.
But we all know we’re subtly influenced by subconscious factors all the time. And if 2020 taught us anything it’s that the majority of people simply do not want to think for themselves when the stakes are high. They want to fit in and be reassured they’re on the right side. They then convince themselves they got there on their own.
I used to get frustrated with this dynamic and spent a lot of time trying to figure out how to get people to pay attention and think critically. But that’s not how God made mankind. We can be idealistic about this, or we can engage the world as it actually is.
And viewing the world realistically, some people just aren’t wired that way. That’s why competent, decisive leadership is so key to all of this—people need to be shepherded.
As I’ve said before, we need to stop using “sheep” as an insult and start reckoning with it as a reality.
In order to set right a church that is adrift in many ways, we have to take all of this into account and apply it. It is not enough to tell people what is right and what is wrong.
A few things we can do:
Build culture. Whether evangelistically or internally, the people we seek to influence need to be given a desire to accept the change they see.
Pray for, raise up, support, and follow leaders. People are looking for some kind of authority to validate their decisions, and they know it when they see it. This undercurrent runs heavily through Timothy and Titus. We can’t do it overnight, but we can start down that road today. And we can make a difference by being the best sheep possible to those who are over us.
Continue to speak Scriptural truths. Though it’s not enough on its own, it’s still absolutely essential. The heart is pricked by the Spirit when the Word is spoken, and the head needs something solid to clamp down on. Aim for the elephant, then show the rider why the elephant’s choice was good and right.
As I’ve said before, there are no shortcuts. Winning debates is fun (and often easy) and doesn’t take long, but we’ve been winning debates longer than any of today’s church has been alive.
True change is going to take a different kind of tactic that starts with the realities of human nature, realities we would have realized all along if we had done things God’s way.
UPDATES:
There will be one more article in this 3 part series on how people are influenced, beginning with “Individualism is a Lie,” then today’s, and culminating next week.
And, the process of book writing is officially underway. I plan to release a chapter here for premium subscribers as soon as August, so stay tuned.
What about congregations who have no elders and deacons? Our "leaders" are a young preacher and other much older men who either have memory problems, health problems, or are not knowledgeable in the scriptures. We have an attendance of about 40, so there is no one to really lead here. Just what do we do?