Do you have more on Revelation? We just finished studying the book at church and the four views we were taught to interpret it through did not include partial- preterism.
That’s sad but I’m not surprised. It’s still the minority position in a lot of places.
I decided to back away from textual based stuff as there are a lot of guys doing that better and more consistently than me, and my wheelhouse is the much less-served niche of cultural apologetics. I do wish I had had time to do more on Revelation though, I think it’s a big deal that we get it right.
Foy Wallace’s commentary on Revelation is free online and it takes the partial preterist view. Bradley Cobb is another brother who does and I’ve heard his book is good.
You cannot understand Revelation without first understanding Daniel, they are like peas and carrots. The application of the day-to-year principle established in EZE 4, and then ratified in Daniel 7-12, to Revelation as well, blows both futurism and preterism up.
Do you have more on Revelation? We just finished studying the book at church and the four views we were taught to interpret it through did not include partial- preterism.
That’s sad but I’m not surprised. It’s still the minority position in a lot of places.
I decided to back away from textual based stuff as there are a lot of guys doing that better and more consistently than me, and my wheelhouse is the much less-served niche of cultural apologetics. I do wish I had had time to do more on Revelation though, I think it’s a big deal that we get it right.
Foy Wallace’s commentary on Revelation is free online and it takes the partial preterist view. Bradley Cobb is another brother who does and I’ve heard his book is good.
You cannot understand Revelation without first understanding Daniel, they are like peas and carrots. The application of the day-to-year principle established in EZE 4, and then ratified in Daniel 7-12, to Revelation as well, blows both futurism and preterism up.